@ineiti @SarahJamieLewis But even if you have that, there are still other risks, particularly around the proof of inclusion. For instance there is the “Clark Kent” risk: you loose your job unless prove you are not a member of a group (in Clark’s case, a group that includes Superman). There are more.

Christopher Allen

@ChristopherA

10/24/2021, 11:48:17 AM

Favs: 0

Retweets: 0

link

Christopher Allen

@ChristopherA

@ineiti @SarahJamieLewis I’m not saying that working toward some type of “proof of unique personhood in a group context” isn’t incredibly valuable, but I’m suggesting be humble and realize it will not be easy and you are unlikely to mitigate or even spot all the risks. Most PoP teams don’t seem to yet.

10/24/2021, 11:51:39 AM

Favs: 1

Retweets: 0

link

Christopher Allen

@ChristopherA

@ineiti @SarahJamieLewis I am, in particular, very concerned about some current global proof of personhood projects, in particular those that require or allow correlation (linkage) to real world identities. When largely 1st-world cis white males are are willing to risk privacy to show status, be scared.

10/24/2021, 11:56:56 AM

Favs: 2

Retweets: 0

link

Christopher Allen

@ChristopherA

@ineiti @SarahJamieLewis I commend you to read @SarahJamieLewis’s collection on Queer Privacy. It is pay-what-you want, but I hope you offer something. Her editorial role in this community to be safer is important. https://leanpub.com/queerprivacy

10/24/2021, 12:01:58 PM

Favs: 0

Retweets: 0

link